The “Widom Larsen Theory” is the most popular and discussed theory of Cold Fusion / LENR at the moment.
This Theory has been heavily supported by Scientists from NASA
In Widom Larsen Theory there is no “Fusion”. Instead there is a creation of “Neutrons” that Decays and Releases Energy.
My Response to CERN regarding studies performed on WL Theory does not necessarily (and most probably not) represent the opinion of other Cold Fusion Researchers and / or laboratories.
Dear Antonio Polosa and Mr Riccardo Faccini
It seems few people in the Cold Fusion society have taken the time to analyze the presentation you gave at CERN regarding Cold Fusion.
I think a reason for the very small attention towards your work is that parts of it are based on fundamental assumptions that are incorrect. For example Cold Fusion reactions typically take place under Pressure. When you load Hydrogen Atoms into a Metal Lattice it makes little sense to consider reactions that occurs in a Vacuum.
As you mentioned in your talk – Cold Fusion is driven foremost by experimental research rather than Theoretical. The promise of Cold Fusion is foremost that of producing Clean and Cheap Energy and that is our focus.
Also the theoretical work you have made is very advanced and answering to it is very difficult on a dime.
The last reason some people haven`t bothered to spend time looking at your research is the assumption that you would attack the Science of Cold Fusion.
If Neutrons was created during the experiments, what is to say they would necessarily leave the cell to be picked up by the detectors? Neutrons have no external electrical charge so they slide into the core of the atom very easily and in some theories this is fundamental to explaining why energy is created.
Gamma Ray on the other hand comes from the Core of Atoms and possible looking for them would be a better place to start? Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project have made preliminary announcements of Gamma Ray Emissions however the Geiger Counter used can also pick up X-Ray Emissions and since the amount of CPM (Counts Per Minute) was only about 200% of background radiation there is still a bit of work to do there.
I would like to thank ENEA for their Experimental Research and CERN for their Theoretical. Also I would like to thank Mr Antonio Polosa and Mr Riccardo Faccini especially. I will not be able to provide much value to your project theoretically – I just have one big nagging question for you:
If you wanted to perform Cold Fusion Research with top of the art measuring equipment – how come you are doing it on a 20 year old Mizuno Cell?
(The Mizuno Cell – Also known as “The Infowars Mayonnaise Reactor” – is one of the most basic devices one can build. I have published the instructions here on my webpage.)
I think personally for me it would have made more sense to run the experiment under pressure with a setup that was optimized for achieving the results you where looking for.
I am a bit sad that conditions for further funding is that you guys find Neutron Emissions.
If you ask me – ONE of the biggest reasons we should fund this kind of research is the lack of Neutron Emission
Next time you guys consider making any more experiments feel free to contact me in order to get hold of some better equipment.
-Maybe (???) I might be able to help you get hold of something better if you describe your needs to me!
Keep Up The Great Work!